I found this rather interesting debate taking place in the Times recently. Kevin Spacey, the famous Hollywood actor and currently artistic director at the Old Vic, rebuts criticism about the arts not being worthy of support during these tough economic times.
Spacey shows the arts for what they are, not just a investment in our children, inspiring and educating all ages, but a valuable tool for the business community to invest in! The UK and Ireland have a very successful arts industry. which is the envy of the world and has a lot to offer all sections of the community and industry, in particular the business community (read David Adairs comments concerning PWC view on the arts).
The Old Vic and the Alley Theatre would have a lot of similar issues, working in areas of high unemployment, however committed to regenerating the area, promoting the arts and developing a strong education programme for a new generation of actors, artists and musicians.
See the letters below and enjoy Mr Spacey putting his superb argument together!
From The Times
May 9, 2009
I won't apologise for defending the arts
It’s not charity or empty philanthropy. It’s an investment in jobs and our collective soul
by Kevin Spacey
Open any newspaper or turn on the TV and you are confronted with the realities of recession. So it is perhaps inevitable that there will be some who frame the arts and culture as luxury items and accept that they will have to survive on shorter rations. And in the grand scheme of things, what does it matter, they say.
I believe that, far from being luxury items, arts and culture are a necessity in our lives, as individuals and as nations. Culture is the strongest ambassador of the human condition we exchange around the world. Countries may go to war but it is culture that unites us. The arts inspire, uplift, challenge, stimulate our conversations, drive our debates and remain in our memories.
For those still unconvinced there is an equally powerful economic argument. Our cultural life contributes to the financial health of communities across the nation. Cultural centres create jobs and generate income for the hotels, restaurants and countless other businesses in the areas where they operate. I, for one, do not want to see another regeneration plan that does not have arts and culture at its heart. Without them we are not building rounded communities, but ignoring the fabric and soul of society.
Now I can't see why anyone would begrudge us practitioners the chance to fight for our cause, but in this very paper Richard Morrison criticised the “usual suspects” for spreading “propaganda” by citing that arts and culture are essential and transformative. The creative industries are fortunate to have many vocal cheerleaders, with names famous enough to get column inches. But frankly, it seems an odd slur to accuse Dame Judi Dench, Antony Gormley, Philip Pullman and Nicholas Serota of being biased merely for having spoken out on behalf of their own professions.
This attack left me confused, just as folk are when I try to explain that my own theatrical home, the Old Vic, receives no public subsidy at all. Some things just don't make sense. Who else should stand up and fight for cultural support other than its practitioners? Should public health policy be advanced, not by NHS leaders, but by lorry drivers and dressmakers? Should arguments about environmental issues be advanced by policemen and pilots?
I don't hear anyone demanding special treatment for the arts above other important and vital public services, but it is an important debate. This isn't about showbusiness and it isn't a trivial argument. This recession is claiming many victims and the arts are under threat. That's why so many of us feel the need to shout about the value that cultural programmes bring to millions of people across the UK, as well as the economic impact of the creative industries throughout the world.
I am delighted to take on Mr Morrison when he states that arguments in favour of arts funding are “as essential and transformative as a wet sock”. That most schemes designed to introduce young people to arts and culture are destined to fail. This notion does a huge disservice to the dedicated professionals who create inspiring programmes for young people.
I have watched as young children from the Old Vic's neighborhood have attended workshops, school projects and community productions and seen them totally engaged and enthralled. These are thousands of kids from low-income families, not some middle-class-only playing field. This is true not only of our work at the Old Vic, but of programmes that the National Theatre, the Young Vic and countless other institutions are providing in London and beyond.
Education through the arts enriches the next generation, and not just of artists. Theatre, for example, teaches young people to communicate, to resolve conflicts, to collaborate and to explore emotions. It's not about whether these kids want a career in the arts when they grow up. These programmes can be good for business as they contribute to a wide range of interpersonal skills. So it's not charity or empty philanthropy, it is an investment in the future of our society.
Kevin Spacey is artistic director of the Old Vic
This is an abridged version, for the full article visit the Times Link below
Spacey shows the arts for what they are, not just a investment in our children, inspiring and educating all ages, but a valuable tool for the business community to invest in! The UK and Ireland have a very successful arts industry. which is the envy of the world and has a lot to offer all sections of the community and industry, in particular the business community (read David Adairs comments concerning PWC view on the arts).The Old Vic and the Alley Theatre would have a lot of similar issues, working in areas of high unemployment, however committed to regenerating the area, promoting the arts and developing a strong education programme for a new generation of actors, artists and musicians.
See the letters below and enjoy Mr Spacey putting his superb argument together!
From The Times
May 9, 2009
I won't apologise for defending the arts
It’s not charity or empty philanthropy. It’s an investment in jobs and our collective soul
by Kevin Spacey
Open any newspaper or turn on the TV and you are confronted with the realities of recession. So it is perhaps inevitable that there will be some who frame the arts and culture as luxury items and accept that they will have to survive on shorter rations. And in the grand scheme of things, what does it matter, they say.
I believe that, far from being luxury items, arts and culture are a necessity in our lives, as individuals and as nations. Culture is the strongest ambassador of the human condition we exchange around the world. Countries may go to war but it is culture that unites us. The arts inspire, uplift, challenge, stimulate our conversations, drive our debates and remain in our memories.
For those still unconvinced there is an equally powerful economic argument. Our cultural life contributes to the financial health of communities across the nation. Cultural centres create jobs and generate income for the hotels, restaurants and countless other businesses in the areas where they operate. I, for one, do not want to see another regeneration plan that does not have arts and culture at its heart. Without them we are not building rounded communities, but ignoring the fabric and soul of society.
Now I can't see why anyone would begrudge us practitioners the chance to fight for our cause, but in this very paper Richard Morrison criticised the “usual suspects” for spreading “propaganda” by citing that arts and culture are essential and transformative. The creative industries are fortunate to have many vocal cheerleaders, with names famous enough to get column inches. But frankly, it seems an odd slur to accuse Dame Judi Dench, Antony Gormley, Philip Pullman and Nicholas Serota of being biased merely for having spoken out on behalf of their own professions.
This attack left me confused, just as folk are when I try to explain that my own theatrical home, the Old Vic, receives no public subsidy at all. Some things just don't make sense. Who else should stand up and fight for cultural support other than its practitioners? Should public health policy be advanced, not by NHS leaders, but by lorry drivers and dressmakers? Should arguments about environmental issues be advanced by policemen and pilots?
I don't hear anyone demanding special treatment for the arts above other important and vital public services, but it is an important debate. This isn't about showbusiness and it isn't a trivial argument. This recession is claiming many victims and the arts are under threat. That's why so many of us feel the need to shout about the value that cultural programmes bring to millions of people across the UK, as well as the economic impact of the creative industries throughout the world.
I am delighted to take on Mr Morrison when he states that arguments in favour of arts funding are “as essential and transformative as a wet sock”. That most schemes designed to introduce young people to arts and culture are destined to fail. This notion does a huge disservice to the dedicated professionals who create inspiring programmes for young people.
I have watched as young children from the Old Vic's neighborhood have attended workshops, school projects and community productions and seen them totally engaged and enthralled. These are thousands of kids from low-income families, not some middle-class-only playing field. This is true not only of our work at the Old Vic, but of programmes that the National Theatre, the Young Vic and countless other institutions are providing in London and beyond.
Education through the arts enriches the next generation, and not just of artists. Theatre, for example, teaches young people to communicate, to resolve conflicts, to collaborate and to explore emotions. It's not about whether these kids want a career in the arts when they grow up. These programmes can be good for business as they contribute to a wide range of interpersonal skills. So it's not charity or empty philanthropy, it is an investment in the future of our society.
Kevin Spacey is artistic director of the Old Vic
This is an abridged version, for the full article visit the Times Link below
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article6251188.ece
And here we have the supporting statement from David Adair from PWC, a man who I would love to introduce to the work of the Alley and demonstrate how well we could develop his CSR strategy in the North West of Ireland.........
And here we have the supporting statement from David Adair from PWC, a man who I would love to introduce to the work of the Alley and demonstrate how well we could develop his CSR strategy in the North West of Ireland.........
From The Times
May 12, 2009
Sir,
I fully endorse Kevin Spacey’s sentiment that support for the arts is about more than “mere charity or empty philanthropy” (Opinion, May 9). Not only do the arts enrich the next generation, but, importantly, they also enrich the business community. Whether people participate as a student or a corporate volunteer, participation in the arts widens and essential skills in the workplace are developed.
Last year we had more than 4,500 volunteers taking part in community-based activities, far away from their day-to-day business responsibilities. That contrast encourages creative thinking, better use of language and improves teamwork and interpersonal skills. All this while enthusing young people with transferable skills and qualities that will ultimately enhance the workplace they will join. Such investment is vital to enable communities and businesses to transcend the chill winds of recession.
David Adair
Head of Community Affairs, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Times Link http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article6268724.ece
No comments:
Post a Comment